MySEODesk
Marketing Gardens
marketinggardens.com · Lynchburg, VA
Search Audit · Tier 2September 17, 2026
Prepared by Greg Bentz, MySEODesk

Eight sections. Pick one to read it; the page shows one at a time so it stays short.

Search Audit

Your technical foundation is fine.
There is almost nothing standing on it.

Marketing Gardens sells content strategy. The site publishes no content. Ten pages carry 3,532 words between them, the blog holds three articles that all say Coming Soon, and the one page that would persuade a buyer is the one page a public search index does not hold.

0
Blog posts published, against three that are announced
300
Median words per page, across 10 pages with copy
7 of 11
Sitemap URLs returned by a public index query
87
Google mobile speed score, median of three runs
The short version

Nothing technical is holding this site back. Robots, sitemap, canonicals, titles, descriptions, alt text, HTTPS, mobile layout and page speed all check out, and robots.txt names fourteen crawlers explicitly, twelve of them AI or AI-training agents, all allowed. What those crawlers find when they arrive is 3,532 words across ten thin pages and a blog with nothing in it. The single case study, the one asset that would convince a copier dealer or an IT provider to call, is not in the public index we checked, while seven shorter pages are. Meanwhile the homepage opens with four performance numbers that nothing on the site supports. The work here is not a technical project. It is publishing, substantiating, and getting the good page found.

01What we looked at, and what we could not

This is a tier 2 audit. It is built entirely from what is publicly visible: a crawl of the site, its structured data, its robots and sitemap files, Google's own PageSpeed Insights API, and a public search index. We have no Search Console access, no Analytics access and no Google Business Profile access for Marketing Gardens, so this report carries no clicks, no impressions, no CTR, no sessions and no conversion figures. Any report that hands you those numbers without an account login invented them.

Everything below can be reproduced from outside. Where a check could not come back cleanly, the report says so instead of filling the gap.

Sources, named

  • Crawl. A link-following crawl from the homepage, not a read of the sitemap. It reached 10 pages. The sitemap lists 11. The difference is /thank-you, which nothing on the site links to.
  • Speed. Google PageSpeed Insights API, mobile, three samples, median reported. Not a local headless run, which reads several points low and swings by seconds between runs.
  • Index coverage. A site: query against a Bing-backed public index, plus a targeted per-page query, plus a control query for a domain that does not exist.
  • Rendering. The pages were opened in a real Chrome at a 390px mobile viewport and read from the accessibility tree, not inferred from raw HTML.
  • Structured data. JSON-LD read directly from each page's source and parsed.
Next

What this turns into

The eight steps in section 08 are in cost order, and the first one needs no budget at all: three posts whose headlines you have already written. If you want the competitive half of this, who is ranking for the managed-IT and copier-dealer terms in your market, what they publish and where the gaps are, that is the next tier up and it runs on paid search data rather than public proxies.

Greg Bentz, MySEODesk
greg@myseodesk.com